---------- Begin PreSurvey Results ---------- Processed 14 students How well do you know Arithmetic Operators (+,-,*,/,%)? Very well - 4 Well - 8 Average - 2 Not well - 0 Not at all - 0 ... ---------- End PreSurvey Results ---------- ---------- Begin PostSurvey Results ---------- Processed 14 students How well do you know Arithmetic Operators (+,-,*,/,%)? Very well - 6 Well - 8 Average - 0 Not well - 0 Not at all - 0 ... ---------- End PostSurvey Results ----------In this example, the number of students who thought they knew arithmetic operators very well went up by 2 from presurvey to post-survey. This shows any change in the self-confidence of the class on the topic of the problet.
---------- Begin Pretest Results ---------- Processed 9 students For Arithmetic.*.Coercion: Number of students processed: 9 Number of students who solved problems: 9 Class Average of Percent Correct Partial Wrong Missed Not Attempted 0.33 / 0.0 / 0.66 / 0.0 / 0.0 / ... ---------- End Pretest Results ---------- ---------- Begin Post-test Results ---------- Processed 9 students For Arithmetic.*.Coercion: Number of students processed: 9 Number of students who solved problems: 9 Class Average of Percent Correct Partial Wrong Missed Not Attempted 0.61 / 0.0 / 0.39 / 0.0 / 0.0 / ... ---------- End Post-test Results ----------In this example, on problems involving coercion and multiplication (the learning objectives), students got an average of 33% of the problems correct on the pre-test and 61% correct on the post-test.
Instructors could use the post-test results to determine the sub-topics that they may want to go over again in class.
---------- Begin Feedback Results ---------- Processed 9 students It was easy to use this problet. Strongly Agree - 0 Agree - 7 Neutral - 1 Disagree - 1 Strongly Disagree - 0 The generated problems were instructive. Strongly Agree - 0 Agree - 6 Neutral - 2 Disagree - 1 Strongly Disagree - 0 The feedback provided to my answers was clear. Strongly Agree - 0 Agree - 7 Neutral - 1 Disagree - 1 Strongly Disagree - 0 ... ---------- End Feedback Results ----------In this example, students mostly agreed that the problet was easy to use, the problems were instructive and the feedback provided by the problet was clear.
--- Begin summary of the Pretest for John Doe --- On problem 1 (Template 300), entered 2 steps, correctly solved 2/2 steps in 28 seconds On problem 2 (Template 203), entered 2 steps, correctly solved 1/2 steps in 17 seconds On problem 3 (Template 305), entered 4 steps, correctly solved 2/2 steps in 25 seconds On problem 4 (Template 424), did not attempt problem ... 0.88 / 0.0 / 0.25 / 0.0 / 0.0 / Arithmetic.%.Correct / 8 / 7 / 0 / 2 / 0 / 0 1.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / Arithmetic.%.Precedence / 6 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 ... --- End summary of the Pretest for John Doe ---Note that the student solved the first problem completely correctly; the second problem partially (only 1 of 2 steps); the third problem partially because the student entered more steps (4) in the answer than there were in the correct answer (2); and did not attempt the fouth problem.
If any data was not used in the analysis, the data is identified in the following format:
The following data was NOT analyzed for John Doe Arithmetic / Registration / Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:03:46 -0500 (EST) Arithmetic / PreSurvey / Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:04:00 -0500 (EST) Arithmetic / Trial Run / Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:06:55 -0500 (EST)Data is not analyzed under the following circumstances: